Consequently, I very much appreciate comments from those with actual driving experience. Thus, I don't have a frame of reference in terms of how well they drive. I appreciate them all.Īdmittedly, I have zero experience driving a Flairbird - or, any T-Bird for that matter. I'd heard they weren't the greatest.Īgain, keep the 64-66 T-Bird comments (good and bad) coming. Thanks ISELLHONDAS for the 'heads up' with regard to the confort level on the T-Bird's seats. Not trying to be a 'stick in the mud' - just trying to keep the conversation flowing in the intended direction. You'll spend less money (than for a restored 60's classic) and have an exponentially better car to go romping on a twisty back road.Īnyway, this is a 1964-1966 Thunderbird discussion so let's not wander too far off of the subject. In my opinion, if you want to go fast, go buy a new Firebird/Camaro (while you still can) or late model Corvette. Neck snapping acceleration and slot-car handling are not priorities on a nice autumn day while cruising in 1960's convertible - that's not the point. My second choice is a '66 Mustang GT convertible, but nice one's are pretty pricey (though nice T-Birds aren't cheap!). In terms of performance, I'm looking for a nice cruising car (hence my need for a convertible). I know the 64's drum brakes are less than steller, but I believe they can be replaced with disc units - at the very least from a '65, but better units are probably available.

I really like the look of the 'Flairbirds' particularly the '64. The Riviera is certainly a nice car, but I want a convertible - so that eliminates the Rivi from consideration. I started this string and have appreciated the comments thus far.

64 thunderbird